Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17191 - 17200 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17191 - 17200 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is an issue that this court reviews de novo. Waukesha Cty. v. S.L.L., 2019 WI 66, ¶10, 387 Wis. 2d 333, 929
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
is an issue that this court reviews de novo. Waukesha Cty. v. S.L.L., 2019 WI 66, ¶10, 387 Wis. 2d 333, 929
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288753 - 2020-09-17
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6210 - 2017-09-19
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6210 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lola M. v. City of Milwaukee
summary judgment determination de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4082 - 2017-09-20
summary judgment determination de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4082 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Michael Ives v. Coopertools
of law that we review de novo. See Oakley v. Fireman's Fund, 162 Wis.2d 821, 826, 470 N.W.2d 882, 884
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8867 - 2017-09-19
of law that we review de novo. See Oakley v. Fireman's Fund, 162 Wis.2d 821, 826, 470 N.W.2d 882, 884
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8867 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
summary judgment ruling, particularly given our de novo standard of review. We need not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
summary judgment ruling, particularly given our de novo standard of review. We need not address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Brown
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
We disagree. ¶9 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21376 - 2017-09-21
Dane Co. DHS v. Shetria B.
on undisputed facts is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20
on undisputed facts is a question of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26536 - 2006-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 51
the pleadings comported with the constitutional notice requirements is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94530 - 2014-09-15
the pleadings comported with the constitutional notice requirements is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94530 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jay A. Jansen
State v. Saternus, 127 Wis.2d 460, 475, 381 N.W.2d 290, 296-97 (1986). We therefore apply de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8596 - 2017-09-19
State v. Saternus, 127 Wis.2d 460, 475, 381 N.W.2d 290, 296-97 (1986). We therefore apply de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8596 - 2017-09-19
State v. Sally S. Boerner
case, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See Olen v. Phelps, 200 Wis.2d 155, 160, 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13575 - 2005-03-31
case, which is a question of law that we review de novo. See Olen v. Phelps, 200 Wis.2d 155, 160, 546
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13575 - 2005-03-31