Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17191 - 17200 of 61077 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, pro se, appeals an order denying his petition to reopen a small claims default judgment entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210296 - 2018-03-27

COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Lake Geneva relating to Marina Bay’s pier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2012-07-24

[PDF] Appeal No. 2009AP728 Cir. Ct. No. 2007CV4035
in the Compensation Fund, and that their remaining claims were barred by sovereign immunity. Whether heath care
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44477 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
made by Gerard. Gerard claims: (1) the trial court should not have granted the protective order; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26615 - 2006-10-02

William Kumprey v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Kumprey subsequently applied for worker’s compensation benefits from Jansen, claiming that since his last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15879 - 2005-03-31

River Alliance of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
that it stated a claim challenging Wis. Admin. Code § NR 102.13 as invalid per se because the rule exceeded DNR’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6244 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
to withdraw his plea before sentencing. This claim has no arguable merit. We next consider the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97900 - 2013-06-11

Frederick Spivey, Jr. v. William G. Otto
claim for relief in their amended complaint for conspiracy to defraud in the sale of a home on the part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8264 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 Rogers’s claims are procedurally barred, and therefore we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a lawsuit challenging whether IJS actually held title to the property.2 He claims that because IJS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1125683 - 2026-06-03