Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1721 - 1730 of 17422 for Cost.
Search results 1721 - 1730 of 17422 for Cost.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm the circuit court order and award costs to Bennett as the prevailing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113119 - 2017-09-21
809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm the circuit court order and award costs to Bennett as the prevailing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113119 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
fees and costs and denying a motion to vacate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94984 - 2014-09-15
fees and costs and denying a motion to vacate. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94984 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
firm of Kohner, Mann & Kailas, S.C. (“KMK”) and awarding costs and fees to North River Insurance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
firm of Kohner, Mann & Kailas, S.C. (“KMK”) and awarding costs and fees to North River Insurance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
State v. Charlie Sislo
would recommend a $100 fine plus $209 in court costs. The court proceeded with a colloquy with Sislo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18850 - 2017-09-21
would recommend a $100 fine plus $209 in court costs. The court proceeded with a colloquy with Sislo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
J. Marso $2,547.55, plus statutory costs. Kingstad argues that even though it failed to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20093 - 2014-09-15
J. Marso $2,547.55, plus statutory costs. Kingstad argues that even though it failed to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20093 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Adams v. Robert Ruffer
court and also grant the respondent’s motion for costs and fees. BACKGROUND Robert Ruffer bought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13171 - 2017-09-21
court and also grant the respondent’s motion for costs and fees. BACKGROUND Robert Ruffer bought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13171 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and consider an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85609 - 2012-07-30
and consider an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85609 - 2012-07-30
CA Blank Order
the circuit court order and award costs to Bennett as the prevailing party, but deny the motion for attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113119 - 2014-05-22
the circuit court order and award costs to Bennett as the prevailing party, but deny the motion for attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113119 - 2014-05-22
Robert J. Marso v. Kingstad Law Offices
, plus statutory costs. Kingstad argues that even though it failed to file a timely notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20093 - 2007-06-04
, plus statutory costs. Kingstad argues that even though it failed to file a timely notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20093 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 Riese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85609 - 2014-09-15
an affidavit and a cost estimate. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 Riese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85609 - 2014-09-15