Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1721 - 1730 of 68512 for MITCHELL LAW.

COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Mitchell, 144 Wis. 2d 596, 605, 424 N.W.2d 698 (1988) (citing Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38717 - 2009-08-03

[PDF] State v. Daniel G. Scheidell
ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Mitchell E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12489 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added recently accepted cases 2015AP2457, 2016AP2196-CR and 2016AP2214
the change in confrontation law initiated by Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), “only testimonial
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193610 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: MITCHELL J. METROPULOS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998870 - 2025-08-19

[PDF]
-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: EVERETT D. MITCHELL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992864 - 2025-08-07

[PDF] WI APP 178
to be the home of a law enforcement officer. He asserts the officer was acting in her official capacity when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34584 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and the scope of such a duty are questions of law for the courts to decide.” Hoida, Inc. v. M&I Midstate Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699971 - 2023-09-06

2008 WI APP 178
addressed to a residence that happened to be the home of a law enforcement officer. He asserts the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34584 - 2011-06-14

[PDF] Frontsheet
. § 973.015. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Vill. of Shorewood v. Steinberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131915 - 2017-09-21

General Star Indemnity Company v. The Bankruptcy Estate of Lake Geneva Sugar Shack, Inc.
on the briefs of James A. Baxter, Esq. and Rebecca Leair, Esq.of Mitchell, Baxter, O’Meara & Mathie, S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11169 - 2005-03-31