Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1721 - 1730 of 6749 for mix.

[PDF] NOTICE
to suppress evidence presents a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Casarez, 2008 WI App 166, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55869 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
-assistance-of-counsel claim presents mixed questions of law and fact. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85491 - 2012-07-30

State v. Michael G. Kachelski
of review of the ineffective assistance of counsel components of performance and prejudice is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12449 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a mixed question of law and fact. See Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1113999 - 2026-05-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
assistance of counsel under a mixed standard. “The factual circumstances of the case and trial counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085846 - 2026-03-04

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
with a mixed question of law and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 609, 516 N.W.2d 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5007 - 2005-03-31

State v. Perry R. Neal
of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Erickson, 227 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7504 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion. ¶3 “A [trial] court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28704 - 2007-04-16

State v. Richard A. M.
of ineffective assistance of counsel present mixed questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21520 - 2006-02-22

State v. Paul Sappington
conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a mixed question of fact and law. See id. at ¶51. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16200 - 2005-03-31