Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1721 - 1730 of 12959 for prosecuting.
Search results 1721 - 1730 of 12959 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We affirm. We previously articulated the winding history of this prosecution in State v. Earls
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795008 - 2024-05-01
. We affirm. We previously articulated the winding history of this prosecution in State v. Earls
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795008 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Facundo
" the government into the criminal activity so as to make repugnant defendant's prosecution. State v. Gibas, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
" the government into the criminal activity so as to make repugnant defendant's prosecution. State v. Gibas, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11557 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
incident. In 2004, Peterson moved to dismiss predicated on the State’s failure to timely prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29966 - 2007-08-13
incident. In 2004, Peterson moved to dismiss predicated on the State’s failure to timely prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29966 - 2007-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The prosecution agreed to recommend a five-year sentence on the possession conviction and that a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237607 - 2019-03-20
. The prosecution agreed to recommend a five-year sentence on the possession conviction and that a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237607 - 2019-03-20
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
the prosecution and for failing to investigate his case. After hearing testimony and argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19
the prosecution and for failing to investigate his case. After hearing testimony and argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19
State v. Barry L. Schouten
suppressing evidence in its prosecution of Barry Schouten. The case began when Police Officer Pfalzgraf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5966 - 2005-03-31
suppressing evidence in its prosecution of Barry Schouten. The case began when Police Officer Pfalzgraf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5966 - 2005-03-31
State v. Julian Esteve McKinnie
with, prosecuted once for, and convicted of only the single offense of felony murder. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20818 - 2005-12-27
with, prosecuted once for, and convicted of only the single offense of felony murder. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20818 - 2005-12-27
[PDF]
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Steve Watters
is whether Weissenberger is entitled to damages and costs he incurred because he prosecuted NO. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11636 - 2017-09-19
is whether Weissenberger is entitled to damages and costs he incurred because he prosecuted NO. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11636 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert F. Midthun
to permit the jury to infer Midthun’s intent to deliver. The prosecution had a duty to prove all elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14857 - 2005-03-31
to permit the jury to infer Midthun’s intent to deliver. The prosecution had a duty to prove all elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14857 - 2005-03-31
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Steve Watters
incurred because he prosecuted an open records mandamus action. We affirm the judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11636 - 2005-03-31
incurred because he prosecuted an open records mandamus action. We affirm the judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11636 - 2005-03-31