Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17201 - 17210 of 30115 for de.
Search results 17201 - 17210 of 30115 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
or other documents. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31277 - 2007-12-19
or other documents. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31277 - 2007-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a proper standard of law is an issue reviewed de novo by this court. Id. Ultimately, it is the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103342 - 2013-10-23
a proper standard of law is an issue reviewed de novo by this court. Id. Ultimately, it is the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103342 - 2013-10-23
City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
of the Hosale building.” We review summary judgment issues de novo employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2005-03-31
of the Hosale building.” We review summary judgment issues de novo employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reach.” Id., ¶17. Whether the court applied a proper standard of law is reviewed de novo. Garfoot v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583013 - 2022-10-28
reach.” Id., ¶17. Whether the court applied a proper standard of law is reviewed de novo. Garfoot v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583013 - 2022-10-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50218 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50218 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. American Colloid Company
de novo. Butler, 282 Wis. 2d 776, ¶11 (citations omitted). ¶7 It is Acuity’s position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25218 - 2017-09-21
de novo. Butler, 282 Wis. 2d 776, ¶11 (citations omitted). ¶7 It is Acuity’s position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25218 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Karl D. Heppner
the weight to be accorded his [or her] testimony is for the [fact-finder].” Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13239 - 2017-09-21
the weight to be accorded his [or her] testimony is for the [fact-finder].” Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13239 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lola M. v. City of Milwaukee
summary judgment determination de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4082 - 2017-09-20
summary judgment determination de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4082 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it is clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts meet constitutional No. 2011AP1523
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83738 - 2014-09-15
it is clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts meet constitutional No. 2011AP1523
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous, and we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15