Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17201 - 17210 of 29721 for des.
Search results 17201 - 17210 of 29721 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion are barred by a previous direct appeal is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56888 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion are barred by a previous direct appeal is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32802 - 2014-09-15
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32802 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc., 211 Wis. 2d 224, 229-30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134102 - 2017-09-21
grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc., 211 Wis. 2d 224, 229-30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Wodenjak
review de novo. State v. 4 Based upon Wodenjak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3401 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. 4 Based upon Wodenjak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3401 - 2017-09-19
State v. William R. Scott
constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31
constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3407 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Luis E. Hernandez
satisfy the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of reasonableness is a question of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3106 - 2017-09-20
satisfy the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of reasonableness is a question of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3106 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
William J. Vonderhaar v. Soo Line Railroad Company
a prima facie case for summary judgment. ¶4 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2221 - 2017-09-19
a prima facie case for summary judgment. ¶4 We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2221 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which we review de novo. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d at 211. ¶15 Based on the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131990 - 2014-12-22
a question of law, which we review de novo. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d at 211. ¶15 Based on the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131990 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this determination de novo. Id., ¶33. To meet this burden, the defendant must show No. 2024AP887-CR 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
this determination de novo. Id., ¶33. To meet this burden, the defendant must show No. 2024AP887-CR 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
then moved the circuit court for de novo review of the court commissioner’s decision, seeking to further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
then moved the circuit court for de novo review of the court commissioner’s decision, seeking to further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13