Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17201 - 17210 of 68502 for did.
Search results 17201 - 17210 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Jasmine was aware of behavioral issues with Cameron and Carter at school, but she admitted that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723122 - 2023-10-31
. Jasmine was aware of behavioral issues with Cameron and Carter at school, but she admitted that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723122 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
James D. Luedtke v. Daniel Bertrand
allegation of seven days’ loss of recreational privileges did not satisfy the “substantial harm” element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13233 - 2017-09-21
allegation of seven days’ loss of recreational privileges did not satisfy the “substantial harm” element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13233 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
policy with Kasal’s employer—which did not provide for the recovery of the insurer’s attorney’s fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256622 - 2020-03-17
policy with Kasal’s employer—which did not provide for the recovery of the insurer’s attorney’s fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256622 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to protect himself and “scare” Melssen off, and Y.Z. did not realize that he stabbed Melssen in the process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20
to protect himself and “scare” Melssen off, and Y.Z. did not realize that he stabbed Melssen in the process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040275 - 2025-11-20
Honore Ann Harvey v. Stephen Gavin Osmanski
for the family support award. That has not occurred here because Judge Sheedy did not feel he had the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2230 - 2005-03-31
for the family support award. That has not occurred here because Judge Sheedy did not feel he had the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2230 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Garry C. Eskridge
to show that Eskridge did not have a subjective expectation of privacy: • Falk’s testimony that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4478 - 2017-09-19
to show that Eskridge did not have a subjective expectation of privacy: • Falk’s testimony that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4478 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Ehler, the arresting officer, did not have the requisite level of suspicion to request that Schoeller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173557 - 2017-09-21
Ehler, the arresting officer, did not have the requisite level of suspicion to request that Schoeller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173557 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County Human Services Department v. Elizabeth A.J.
, the conditions for the return of the child to Elizabeth and James did not change substantially. On September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12591 - 2017-09-21
, the conditions for the return of the child to Elizabeth and James did not change substantially. On September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12591 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing, concluding the petition did not set forth any new evidence, not considered at the original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113104 - 2017-09-21
hearing, concluding the petition did not set forth any new evidence, not considered at the original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113104 - 2017-09-21
La Crosse County Human Services Department v. Elizabeth A.J.
for the return of the child to Elizabeth and James did not change substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12591 - 2005-03-31
for the return of the child to Elizabeth and James did not change substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12591 - 2005-03-31