Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17221 - 17230 of 30115 for de.
Search results 17221 - 17230 of 30115 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Knova K. Green
a search is valid, however, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3098 - 2017-09-20
a search is valid, however, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3098 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6208 - 2017-09-19
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6208 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 598. We review de novo whether the officers’ exercise of their community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174103 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 598. We review de novo whether the officers’ exercise of their community caretaker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91964 - 2014-09-15
decision to deny a postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91964 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97422 - 2013-05-28
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97422 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.1 Judith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.1 Judith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Charleetra S. Johnson
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5454 - 2017-09-19
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5454 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to the facts of the case and is subject to this court’s de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660675 - 2023-05-31
of constitutional principles to the facts of the case and is subject to this court’s de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660675 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Bryan Lee Hudson
it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo. Id. Hudson argues that his counsel should have called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9831 - 2017-09-19
it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo. Id. Hudson argues that his counsel should have called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9831 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the agreement. Cahoon appeals. ¶6 Our review is de novo, both with regard to summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110997 - 2017-09-21
of the agreement. Cahoon appeals. ¶6 Our review is de novo, both with regard to summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110997 - 2017-09-21