Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17221 - 17230 of 29848 for des.
Search results 17221 - 17230 of 29848 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Alan Thomas LaPean
review de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis. 2d 346, 355, 523 N.W.2d 113 (Ct. App. 1994). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7386 - 2017-09-20
review de novo. See State v. Toliver, 187 Wis. 2d 346, 355, 523 N.W.2d 113 (Ct. App. 1994). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7386 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law for our de novo review. See PRN Assocs. LLC v. DOA, 2009 WI 53, ¶25, 317 Wis. 2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354228 - 2021-04-13
a question of law for our de novo review. See PRN Assocs. LLC v. DOA, 2009 WI 53, ¶25, 317 Wis. 2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354228 - 2021-04-13
[PDF]
Warren Viergutz v. Marvin Kraut
, we apply the same methodology as the trial court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21
, we apply the same methodology as the trial court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Zebro
426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id.; Bartley v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14549 - 2017-09-21
426, 430, 303 N.W.2d 122, 125 (Ct. App. 1981). Our review here is de novo. See id.; Bartley v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14549 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that arise during our review of an exercise of discretion are decided de novo. See King v. King, 224 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197683 - 2017-10-11
that arise during our review of an exercise of discretion are decided de novo. See King v. King, 224 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197683 - 2017-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The application of the implied consent law to an undisputed set of facts is a question this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297757 - 2020-10-21
The application of the implied consent law to an undisputed set of facts is a question this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297757 - 2020-10-21
State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5146 - 2005-03-31
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5146 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Karen Sann v. Badger Care-A-Vans, Inc.
The issue presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4371 - 2017-09-19
The issue presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4371 - 2017-09-19
State v. Chad J. Knoll
proceeding, involve questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Howard-Hastings, 218 Wis. 2d 152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15739 - 2005-03-31
proceeding, involve questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Howard-Hastings, 218 Wis. 2d 152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15739 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ashanti D.
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10355 - 2005-03-31
counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127‑28, 449
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10355 - 2005-03-31