Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17221 - 17230 of 29848 for des.
Search results 17221 - 17230 of 29848 for des.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
summary judgment ruling, particularly given our de novo standard of review. We need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
summary judgment ruling, particularly given our de novo standard of review. We need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous; however, we determine de novo whether or when a seizure occurred. Id. ¶8 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
clearly erroneous; however, we determine de novo whether or when a seizure occurred. Id. ¶8 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75130 - 2011-12-13
Frontsheet
de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38150 - 2009-07-22
de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38150 - 2009-07-22
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carlos Gamino
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21
-D 8 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24945 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390669 - 2021-07-14
and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390669 - 2021-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. If the defendant’s “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730975 - 2023-11-22
“is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Balliette, 336 Wis. 2d 358, ¶18. If the defendant’s “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730975 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
T & T Masonry, Inc. v. Roxton Associates
, 195 Wis.2d at 496-97, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Although we review summary judgment de novo, id. at 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9839 - 2017-09-19
, 195 Wis.2d at 496-97, 536 N.W.2d at 182. Although we review summary judgment de novo, id. at 496
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9839 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680463 - 2023-07-20
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680463 - 2023-07-20
[PDF]
Andrea L. Propper v. Ryan T. Propper
of a written contract presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. Whether a contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24543 - 2017-09-21
of a written contract presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. Whether a contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24543 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d 404. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d 404. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21