Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17221 - 17230 of 17566 for ex.

[PDF] WI 15
in the statutory language. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court No. 2005AP544 24 for Dane County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28004 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 78
was not in custody for sentence credit purposes); State ex rel. Macemon v. McReynolds, 208 Wis. 2d 594, 561 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68084 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael S., Jr.
of statutory interpretation set out in State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58, 271
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18667 - 2005-06-21

[PDF] State v. Dirk E. Harris
present during interrogation is inadmissible); United States ex rel. Hudson v. Cannon, 529 F.2d 890 (7th
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16857 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 57
be given its full, proper, and intended effect.” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Ct. for Dane Cnty., 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996984 - 2025-10-09

[PDF] Frontsheet
v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305, 310-11 (2009) (ex parte affidavits cannot circumvent the right
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625344 - 2023-03-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
often refer to the presentence investigation for context. See, e.g., State ex rel. Wren v. Richardson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478187 - 2022-03-31

[PDF] WI 61
in State ex rel. La Follette v. Raskin, 34 Wis. 2d 607, 150 N.W.2d 318 (1967). In Raskin, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99195 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2025 Samuel A. Christensen Clerk...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035810 - 2025-11-07

[PDF] WI APP 27
of the statute,’” and if the meaning of the statute is plain, the inquiry typically ends there. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163903 - 2017-09-21