Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17231 - 17240 of 68527 for did.

wi APP 17 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2907-CR Complete Title...
argument did not persuade the circuit court to grant the motion to suppress. However, during the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91595 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on there.” No. 2013AP1534-CR 3 ¶5 Upon further questioning from the court, Twocrow admitted he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110319 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Diane M. Wettstaedt v. Gary E. Wettstaedt
. We disagree and conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3250 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in light of the fact that the State did not bring criminal charges against either Aaron or Andrew
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680940 - 2023-07-25

La Crosse County Human Services Department v. Elizabeth A.J.
for the return of the child to Elizabeth and James did not change substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12591 - 2005-03-31

Heidi Praefke v. American Enterprise Life Insurance Co.
. They assert that the power of attorney did not authorize Praefke to make gratuitous transfers of Glasslein’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4535 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
, 2008) (“Kurtz I”). Because the trial court concluded that evidence at the retrospective hearing did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39573 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the dashboard of the customer’s vehicle, although the employee’s manager agreed that the employee likely did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86918 - 2012-09-10

[PDF] State v. John M. Anderson
had told him that Anderson did not believe the attorney was representing him well. At the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7103 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
a suppression motion did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm. ¶2 On June 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140750 - 2015-04-28