Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 91552 for 1.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 91552 for 1.
[PDF]
State v. Lisa M. Berger
a judgment of the circuit court for Washington County: DAVID C. RESHESKE, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2865 - 2017-09-19
a judgment of the circuit court for Washington County: DAVID C. RESHESKE, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BROWN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2865 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
The Warehouse II, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The Warehouse II, LLC, appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6995 - 2017-09-20
. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. The Warehouse II, LLC, appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6995 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Rufus West v. Gerald Berge
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Rufus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20998 - 2017-09-21
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Rufus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20998 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
: (1) the new evidence required the trial court to grant a new trial; (2) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8118 - 2005-03-31
: (1) the new evidence required the trial court to grant a new trial; (2) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106315 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106315 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jacqueline Farence
Roggensack, Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jacqueline Farence appeals a pair of related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5150 - 2017-09-19
Roggensack, Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jacqueline Farence appeals a pair of related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5150 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Berrell Freeman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
is whether the hearing officer violated Freeman’s due process rights because he: (1) processed the conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11127 - 2017-09-19
is whether the hearing officer violated Freeman’s due process rights because he: (1) processed the conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11127 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Michael V. Hendricks
. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J.1 Michael Hendricks appeals his conviction for speeding. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2178 - 2017-09-19
. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J.1 Michael Hendricks appeals his conviction for speeding. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2178 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Allen R. West
of the circuit court for Sauk County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER, J. 1 Allen West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5623 - 2017-09-19
of the circuit court for Sauk County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER, J. 1 Allen West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5623 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a. warpinski, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82611 - 2012-05-16
a. warpinski, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82611 - 2012-05-16