Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis.2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12542 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis.2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12542 - 2005-03-31
Tony Schroeckenthaler v. Roger Philbrick
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6463 - 2005-03-31
of the two small claims actions and a demand for a trial de novo. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6463 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. We conclude that LeFlore has not established that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823702 - 2024-07-09
that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. We conclude that LeFlore has not established that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823702 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to this as the guilty-plea-waiver rule, and its application is a question of law that we consider de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246201 - 2019-09-10
to this as the guilty-plea-waiver rule, and its application is a question of law that we consider de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246201 - 2019-09-10
[PDF]
State v. Perk E. Thomas
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14969 - 2017-09-21
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14969 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher E. Betow
statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14443 - 2005-03-31
statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14443 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
demanded a jury trial. ¶9 Interpreting Gerard’s jury trial demand as a petition for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33875 - 2008-09-02
demanded a jury trial. ¶9 Interpreting Gerard’s jury trial demand as a petition for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33875 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
General Casualty Insurance Company v. Feuling Concrete Construction, Inc.
and application of a contract, the question is solely one of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7860 - 2017-09-19
and application of a contract, the question is solely one of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7860 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
present questions of law we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9, 16, 331 Wis. 2d 640
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077834 - 2026-02-18
present questions of law we review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶¶9, 16, 331 Wis. 2d 640
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077834 - 2026-02-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in a criminal prosecution is a question of law, subject to our de novo review.” State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082934 - 2026-03-03
in a criminal prosecution is a question of law, subject to our de novo review.” State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082934 - 2026-03-03