Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 30115 for de.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 30115 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subsequently sought de novo review in the circuit court, requesting a jury trial. Both parties moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250938 - 2019-12-04
subsequently sought de novo review in the circuit court, requesting a jury trial. Both parties moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250938 - 2019-12-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56843 - 2014-09-15
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274, ¶34, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 602, 654
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45467 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274, ¶34, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 602, 654
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45467 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Worden
. Statutory construction presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2116 - 2017-09-19
. Statutory construction presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2116 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Outagamie County v. Town of Greenville
contention presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15649 - 2017-09-21
contention presents a question of statutory interpretation, a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations that are sufficient to require a hearing presents an additional question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103706 - 2017-09-21
allegations that are sufficient to require a hearing presents an additional question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Walter A. Kirch III
interpretation. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13683 - 2017-09-21
interpretation. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13683 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl F. Hickman
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Chad A. Hansen
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15348 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15348 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Maurices Incorporated v. Emperor's Kitchen, Inc.
the parties dispute. Maurices claims that our review is de novo, as the trial court granted Emperor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15685 - 2017-09-21
the parties dispute. Maurices claims that our review is de novo, as the trial court granted Emperor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15685 - 2017-09-21