Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 61056 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 61056 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” While the no-merit response does not further explain the basis for this claim, the record also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
.” While the no-merit response does not further explain the basis for this claim, the record also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
Certification
in the Compensation Fund, and that their remaining claims were barred by sovereign immunity. Whether heath care
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44477 - 2009-12-09
in the Compensation Fund, and that their remaining claims were barred by sovereign immunity. Whether heath care
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44477 - 2009-12-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the circuit court erred in denying his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. He further contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997116 - 2025-08-20
that the circuit court erred in denying his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. He further contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997116 - 2025-08-20
State v. Randy L. Pralle
that Pralle could have raised his claims in his response to the no-merit report. Because Pralle did not do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20691 - 2005-12-19
that Pralle could have raised his claims in his response to the no-merit report. Because Pralle did not do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20691 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a lawsuit challenging whether IJS actually held title to the property.2 He claims that because IJS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1125683 - 2026-06-03
a lawsuit challenging whether IJS actually held title to the property.2 He claims that because IJS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1125683 - 2026-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
dissented: Donna D. and Lynn G.[2] I. ¶3 Jimmy J.’s only claim of error on this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118898 - 2014-08-04
dissented: Donna D. and Lynn G.[2] I. ¶3 Jimmy J.’s only claim of error on this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118898 - 2014-08-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to counsel and his due process right to a fair trial. Vang also moved for a Machner 3 hearing, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166609 - 2017-09-21
to counsel and his due process right to a fair trial. Vang also moved for a Machner 3 hearing, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166609 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
” Slocum’s claims, a requirement of a final order or judgment. See Wambolt v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
” Slocum’s claims, a requirement of a final order or judgment. See Wambolt v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suppression claim indefinitely in multiple postconviction motions. Instead, trial No. 2018AP2196
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248687 - 2019-10-11
suppression claim indefinitely in multiple postconviction motions. Instead, trial No. 2018AP2196
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248687 - 2019-10-11
Donna Shirley v. William J. Mallory
of living adjustment contemplated in the 1985 judgment of divorce. Mallory claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10073 - 2005-03-31
of living adjustment contemplated in the 1985 judgment of divorce. Mallory claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10073 - 2005-03-31