Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 64206 for records/1000.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 64206 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669174 - 2023-06-20
a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669174 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
Darnell Jackson v. Gary McCaughtry
of the report, there is no record that he raised the issue before the disciplinary committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13674 - 2017-09-21
of the report, there is no record that he raised the issue before the disciplinary committee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13674 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward L. Carter
$2500 as a habitual offender. He contends that no factual basis exists in the record to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9244 - 2005-03-31
$2500 as a habitual offender. He contends that no factual basis exists in the record to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=477726 - 2022-02-01
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=477726 - 2022-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2021-22).1 Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885196 - 2024-12-05
(2021-22).1 Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885196 - 2024-12-05
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, but has not filed responses. Upon consideration of the reports and an independent review of the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97143 - 2014-09-15
, but has not filed responses. Upon consideration of the reports and an independent review of the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97143 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209228 - 2018-03-07
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209228 - 2018-03-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157227 - 2017-09-21
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157227 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739323 - 2023-12-12
, but he has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739323 - 2023-12-12
State v. Carl R. Lippstock
a court to state on the record why it was deviating from the guidelines. The guidelines for Lippstock’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10951 - 2005-03-31
a court to state on the record why it was deviating from the guidelines. The guidelines for Lippstock’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10951 - 2005-03-31