Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17241 - 17250 of 39491 for wife of dane grospe.

Ernie Lessard v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
that limit the change or extension of non-conforming uses. Schroeder v. Dane County Bd. of Adj., 228 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4568 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the ban on visitation would be considered.” Id., ¶9; accord Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58090 - 2010-12-20

COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Dane County: JOHN C. ALBERT, Judge. Affirmed. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36258 - 2009-04-22

[PDF] NOTICE
. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O’BRIEN, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31822 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Donald Wollheim v. University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Inc.
and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: DAVID T. FLANAGAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19405 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael S.E. v. Shawn B.S.
for Dane County, 2000 WI App 261, 240 Wis. 2d 197, 622 N.W.2d 29, Michael argues that as an indigent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5041 - 2017-09-19

State v. Bradley J. Vorburger
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: steven d. ebert, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2480 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas A. Drexler
precedents of Carpenter v. County of Dane, 9 Wis. 249 (1859); Sparkman v. State, 27 Wis. 2d 92, 133 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5262 - 2017-09-19

Michael F. Johnson v. Amanda A. Ziegler
., Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3448 - 2005-03-31

Lake City Corporation v. City of Mequon
extraterritorial zoning). Therefore, by default, the parcel was covered by a Dane County ordinance which permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8354 - 2005-03-31