Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17251 - 17260 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 17251 - 17260 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
its motion to suppress because, it contends, the vehicles were unreasonably seized, in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4871 - 2005-03-31
its motion to suppress because, it contends, the vehicles were unreasonably seized, in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4871 - 2005-03-31
Randall Doherty CPA, Inc. v. Ameritech Corporation
Ameritech. The trial court granted the motion and entered judgment dismissing Ameritech from the lawsuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15127 - 2005-03-31
Ameritech. The trial court granted the motion and entered judgment dismissing Ameritech from the lawsuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15127 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to modify the sentence as unduly harsh. The only issue on appeal is whether the court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29700 - 2007-07-16
motion to modify the sentence as unduly harsh. The only issue on appeal is whether the court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29700 - 2007-07-16
[PDF]
State v. Paul C. Wozny
entered against him and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6468 - 2017-09-19
entered against him and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6468 - 2017-09-19
State v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
its motion to suppress because, it contends, the vehicles were unreasonably seized, in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4872 - 2005-03-31
its motion to suppress because, it contends, the vehicles were unreasonably seized, in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4872 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Pride claims that the police destroyed apparently exculpatory evidence, thereby violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2008-09-02
postconviction motion. Pride claims that the police destroyed apparently exculpatory evidence, thereby violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2008-09-02
[PDF]
State v. Larry Anderson
count of delivery of cocaine as a subsequent offender in exchange for a dismissal and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3843 - 2017-09-20
count of delivery of cocaine as a subsequent offender in exchange for a dismissal and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3843 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
for the State dismissing two charges against him and recommending no more than seventeen years of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112693 - 2014-05-15
for the State dismissing two charges against him and recommending no more than seventeen years of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112693 - 2014-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was dismissed as a read-in at sentencing. Sentencing immediately followed the acceptance of the plea. Both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103800 - 2017-09-21
was dismissed as a read-in at sentencing. Sentencing immediately followed the acceptance of the plea. Both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kimberly A. Tomaras
to dismiss the refusal proceeding. ¶3 Tomaras’s motion did not allege that the officer lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5218 - 2017-09-19
to dismiss the refusal proceeding. ¶3 Tomaras’s motion did not allege that the officer lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5218 - 2017-09-19