Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17251 - 17260 of 82956 for simple case.
Search results 17251 - 17260 of 82956 for simple case.
State v. George T. Wolfer, Jr.
to his case. Wolfer has not persuaded us that the court misused or exceeded its discretion in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9344 - 2005-03-31
to his case. Wolfer has not persuaded us that the court misused or exceeded its discretion in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9344 - 2005-03-31
State v. Delbert L. Manke
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9398 - 2005-03-31
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9398 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
otherwise noted. No. 2023AP1295-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880024 - 2024-11-26
otherwise noted. No. 2023AP1295-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880024 - 2024-11-26
State v. Delbert L. Manke
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9400 - 2005-03-31
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9400 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104548 - 2026-04-14
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104548 - 2026-04-14
State v. Marvin D. Clements
the defendant’s intention matter in this case?—provides the background for the issue on appeal. When the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3168 - 2005-03-31
the defendant’s intention matter in this case?—provides the background for the issue on appeal. When the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3168 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, consecutive to the sentence she currently was serving in a Waukesha county case. ¶3 Before pleading guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43959 - 2014-09-15
, consecutive to the sentence she currently was serving in a Waukesha county case. ¶3 Before pleading guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43959 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Raniewicz
began its case. On the morning of January 23, 1991, defense counsel informed the court that Raniewicz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3077 - 2017-09-19
began its case. On the morning of January 23, 1991, defense counsel informed the court that Raniewicz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3077 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in Carnemolla is inconsistent with other case law. We disagree. Freeman does not cite any case law clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517981 - 2022-05-05
in Carnemolla is inconsistent with other case law. We disagree. Freeman does not cite any case law clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517981 - 2022-05-05