Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17261 - 17270 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 17261 - 17270 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a jury trial. Attorney Ann Auberry has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916618 - 2025-02-19
a jury trial. Attorney Ann Auberry has filed a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916618 - 2025-02-19
Donald R. Stringer v. Joyce D. Stringer
erroneously exercised its discretion. We conclude that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9263 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion. We conclude that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9263 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William J. Evers v. Robert J. Lerner
, Robert Lerner, under the doctrine of claim preclusion. The Everses argue that the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13852 - 2014-09-15
, Robert Lerner, under the doctrine of claim preclusion. The Everses argue that the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13852 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared a witness unqualified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9287 - 2017-09-19
) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared a witness unqualified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9287 - 2017-09-19
Dawn M. Malinowski v. Brian G. Malinowski
dismissed the order to show cause. Dawn sought a de novo review before the trial court. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11226 - 2005-03-31
dismissed the order to show cause. Dawn sought a de novo review before the trial court. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11226 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D. Morris
an officer after a court trial and from an order denying his postconviction motions. Morris raises numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4566 - 2005-03-31
an officer after a court trial and from an order denying his postconviction motions. Morris raises numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4566 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ozaukee County v. Perry P. Lieuallen
. This is an appeal of a conviction following a jury trial for operating a vehicle while intoxicated. Perry P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15346 - 2017-09-21
. This is an appeal of a conviction following a jury trial for operating a vehicle while intoxicated. Perry P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15346 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Vincent Konrad Knox
) and 946.31(1)(c) (2003-04). 1 Knox claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20880 - 2017-09-21
) and 946.31(1)(c) (2003-04). 1 Knox claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20880 - 2017-09-21
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
, Farrey argues that the trial court erred in granting the motions for summary judgment.[2] We reverse.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9557 - 2005-03-31
, Farrey argues that the trial court erred in granting the motions for summary judgment.[2] We reverse.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9557 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christina M. Goerlitz
. ΒΆ1 VERGERONT, J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals the decision and order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
. ΒΆ1 VERGERONT, J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals the decision and order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31