Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17261 - 17270 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 17261 - 17270 of 58506 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court erred in denying Cotton’s motion to suppress evidence seized from a black bag in a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65354 - 2011-06-07
the trial court erred in denying Cotton’s motion to suppress evidence seized from a black bag in a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65354 - 2011-06-07
William J. Evers v. Robert J. Lerner
of claim preclusion. The Everses argue that the trial court relied solely on an Outagamie County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13852 - 2005-03-31
of claim preclusion. The Everses argue that the trial court relied solely on an Outagamie County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13852 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
. The issues are whether: (1) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
. The issues are whether: (1) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carol A. Davis
, Stats., 1991-92. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8279 - 2005-03-31
, Stats., 1991-92. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Correy Robertson
Robertson appeals from the judgments, following a jury trial, convicting him of two counts of battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4560 - 2017-09-20
Robertson appeals from the judgments, following a jury trial, convicting him of two counts of battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4560 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
facilitated the return to trial counsel of Vieth’s completed plea paperwork. The plea form stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
facilitated the return to trial counsel of Vieth’s completed plea paperwork. The plea form stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
, Farrey argues that the trial court erred in granting the motions for summary judgment.[2] We reverse.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9076 - 2005-03-31
, Farrey argues that the trial court erred in granting the motions for summary judgment.[2] We reverse.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9076 - 2005-03-31
Chippewa County v. Julie L.
contends that the trial court erred when it permitted a second ch. 51, Stats., mental commitment emergency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14050 - 2005-03-31
contends that the trial court erred when it permitted a second ch. 51, Stats., mental commitment emergency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14050 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
. The issues are whether: (1) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9283 - 2005-03-31
. The issues are whether: (1) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9283 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael Davis v. Gary McCaughtry
against the policy, and damages against each defendant. The trial court granted summary judgment to all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13263 - 2017-09-21
against the policy, and damages against each defendant. The trial court granted summary judgment to all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13263 - 2017-09-21