Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17271 - 17280 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 17271 - 17280 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Universal Foods Corporation v. Elizabeth A. Zande
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4203 - 2005-03-31
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4203 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, because whether a particular set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103115 - 2013-10-14
, because whether a particular set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103115 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion such that the stop was constitutional is a question we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32740 - 2008-05-19
reasonable suspicion such that the stop was constitutional is a question we review de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32740 - 2008-05-19
[PDF]
State v. Frankie Groenke
to justify a new trial. We disagree. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20
to justify a new trial. We disagree. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to the facts of the case and is subject to this court’s de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660675 - 2023-05-31
of constitutional principles to the facts of the case and is subject to this court’s de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660675 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and for protective placement are questions of law that we review de novo. See Walworth County v. Therese B., 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598005 - 2022-12-06
and for protective placement are questions of law that we review de novo. See Walworth County v. Therese B., 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598005 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a de novo review of a contract, see, e.g., Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191528 - 2017-09-21
to a de novo review of a contract, see, e.g., Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191528 - 2017-09-21
S.J.A.J. v. First Things First
the lawsuit. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15194 - 2005-03-31
the lawsuit. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review de novo the trial court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry Pocan
…. As such … review of the circuit court’s … decision is de novo …. [We] will search the record for any substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18852 - 2017-09-21
…. As such … review of the circuit court’s … decision is de novo …. [We] will search the record for any substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18852 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James P. Sullivan
the 5 Although our review in this case requires a de novo interpretation of § 343.305(9), STATS., we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12789 - 2017-09-21
the 5 Although our review in this case requires a de novo interpretation of § 343.305(9), STATS., we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12789 - 2017-09-21