Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17271 - 17280 of 29832 for des.
Search results 17271 - 17280 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Donna J. Prill
de novo. See State v. Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d 135, 148, 556 N.W.2d 728, 733-34 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4004 - 2017-09-20
de novo. See State v. Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d 135, 148, 556 N.W.2d 728, 733-34 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4004 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
is a legal issue we review de novo. Steele v. Pacesetter Motor Cars, Inc., 2003 WI App 242, ¶10, 267 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24798 - 2017-09-21
is a legal issue we review de novo. Steele v. Pacesetter Motor Cars, Inc., 2003 WI App 242, ¶10, 267 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24798 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Paula R. Becvar v. Charles F. Becvar
of law de novo. Id. To the extent the court’s determination relies on findings of fact, we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2990 - 2017-09-19
of law de novo. Id. To the extent the court’s determination relies on findings of fact, we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2990 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2012-01-10
performance was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76078 - 2012-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
. Id. This determination is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35125 - 2009-01-13
State v. Mitchel L. Schanke
, 218 Wis.2d 180, 189-90, 577 N.W.2d 794, 798-99 (1998), our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13749 - 2005-03-31
, 218 Wis.2d 180, 189-90, 577 N.W.2d 794, 798-99 (1998), our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13749 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
it was prejudicial, are legal issues we review de novo, id. at 236-37. A. Hearsay Statements. ¶8 Hopkins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, parsed out individually, were de minimis. True, some of the discrepancies seem trivial: Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56618 - 2010-11-16
, parsed out individually, were de minimis. True, some of the discrepancies seem trivial: Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56618 - 2010-11-16
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10929 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10929 - 2005-03-31