Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17271 - 17280 of 29713 for des.
Search results 17271 - 17280 of 29713 for des.
State v. Chad Williams
de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶17 Williams does not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14046 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶17 Williams does not assert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14046 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ultimately is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07
ultimately is sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562677 - 2022-09-07
[PDF]
Cochran v. Public Service Commission
is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 273, 290-91, 538 N.W.2d 588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14177 - 2014-09-15
is ultimately presented which we review de novo. See Jocz v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 273, 290-91, 538 N.W.2d 588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14177 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Marvin Poirier v. Town of Howard
. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means of judicial review when the taxpayer claims an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2105 - 2017-09-19
. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means of judicial review when the taxpayer claims an excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2105 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See id., 211 Wis. 2d at 203–204, 564 N.W.2d at 720. ¶10 The first Klessig step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76219 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See id., 211 Wis. 2d at 203–204, 564 N.W.2d at 720. ¶10 The first Klessig step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76219 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ashanti D.
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
reviewing “the ultimate determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10355 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
H&H Assad, LLC v. City of Milwaukee
application. ¶5 On April 5, 2002, Assad returned to circuit court with a motion for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6085 - 2017-09-19
application. ¶5 On April 5, 2002, Assad returned to circuit court with a motion for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6085 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in that respect. In terms of [past] pain and suffering, $10,000 is de minimis. But it is the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107420 - 2017-09-21
in that respect. In terms of [past] pain and suffering, $10,000 is de minimis. But it is the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107420 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶5 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30061 - 2014-09-15
¶5 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30061 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Robertson, 2003 WI App 84, ¶24. New Evidence ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119412 - 2014-09-15
presents a question of law that we review de novo. Robertson, 2003 WI App 84, ¶24. New Evidence ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119412 - 2014-09-15