Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17271 - 17280 of 76940 for see.
Search results 17271 - 17280 of 76940 for see.
Thomas McPhetridge v. Jon E. Litscher
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4148 - 2005-03-31
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard K. Numrich
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16100 - 2017-09-21
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16100 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
There is no manifest injustice upon which Harmston could withdraw his pleas. See State v. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175029 - 2017-09-21
There is no manifest injustice upon which Harmston could withdraw his pleas. See State v. Duychak, 133 Wis. 2d 307
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175029 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20);1 see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344681 - 2021-03-11
. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20);1 see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344681 - 2021-03-11
[PDF]
State v. Paul T. Tatum
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24813 - 2017-09-21
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24813 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James M. Welter
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3110 - 2017-09-20
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3110 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138259 - 2017-09-21
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138259 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. At a bench trial on Ngam’s speeding citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305132 - 2020-11-17
, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. At a bench trial on Ngam’s speeding citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305132 - 2020-11-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872279 - 2024-11-06
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872279 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
Bruce A. Rumage v. Gary A. McCaughtry
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 97-1130 STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12373 - 2017-09-21
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 97-1130 STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12373 - 2017-09-21