Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17271 - 17280 of 82938 for simple case.

COURT OF APPEALS
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Raniewicz
began its case. On the morning of January 23, 1991, defense counsel informed the court that Raniewicz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3077 - 2017-09-19

Margaret Hovey v. Allstate Insurance Company
, Hovey’s attorney did not arrive in the courtroom until after the case had been called and dismissed. Her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15197 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Mequon v. Michael Sterr
days .... The issue in this case is whether the requirements of this paragraph are a prerequisite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9509 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in Carnemolla is inconsistent with other case law. We disagree. Freeman does not cite any case law clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517981 - 2022-05-05

[PDF] State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
. In these consolidated cases, Frankie Wardell Simmons, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4038 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] May a reserve judge serve as president of a civic, non-profit organization, a substantial part of whose mission is to advocate social goals through litigation and legislative action?
. The reserve judge acknowledges that recusal would be necessary in any case involving the civic organization
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Frank Rzepkowski v. Robert Schuenke
there is an exception to the exclusion that applies in this case. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14197 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the case cannot be dismissed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 799.22. On December 16, 2015, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172698 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel D. Brown
in the case, and under § 757.19(2)(g), because it prevented her from acting impartially in the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14