Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17281 - 17290 of 64217 for records.
Search results 17281 - 17290 of 64217 for records.
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
a DNA sample and pay a $250 DNA surcharge. We conclude that the record does not demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
a DNA sample and pay a $250 DNA surcharge. We conclude that the record does not demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report and after conducting an independent review of the Record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95073 - 2014-09-15
report and after conducting an independent review of the Record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95073 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James A. Kohlwey
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12020 - 2017-09-21
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210725 - 2018-04-11
at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210725 - 2018-04-11
[PDF]
CONFIDENTIAL COURT RECORD
CONFIDENTIAL COURT RECORD CV-420, Respondent’s Information for Service by Sheriff Wis. Stats
/formdisplay/CV-420.pdf?formNumber=CV-420&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2026-05-18
CONFIDENTIAL COURT RECORD CV-420, Respondent’s Information for Service by Sheriff Wis. Stats
/formdisplay/CV-420.pdf?formNumber=CV-420&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2026-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231770 - 2019-01-08
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231770 - 2019-01-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465858 - 2021-12-21
the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465858 - 2021-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
but has not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244238 - 2019-07-31
but has not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244238 - 2019-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218627 - 2018-08-31
independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218627 - 2018-08-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP286-CRNM 2 merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453177 - 2021-11-17
. No. 2021AP286-CRNM 2 merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453177 - 2021-11-17