Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17281 - 17290 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 17281 - 17290 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
that the trial court erred in granting the motions for summary judgment.2 We reverse.3 Farrey received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9557 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred in granting the motions for summary judgment.2 We reverse.3 Farrey received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9557 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
that the trial court erred in granting the motions for summary judgment.2 We reverse.3 Farrey received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9076 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred in granting the motions for summary judgment.2 We reverse.3 Farrey received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9076 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
facilitated the return to trial counsel of Vieth’s completed plea paperwork. The plea form stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
facilitated the return to trial counsel of Vieth’s completed plea paperwork. The plea form stated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court erred in denying Cotton’s motion to suppress evidence seized from a black bag in a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65354 - 2011-06-07
the trial court erred in denying Cotton’s motion to suppress evidence seized from a black bag in a vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65354 - 2011-06-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no contest plea and whether the trial court appropriately exercised its sentencing discretion. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134690 - 2017-09-21
no contest plea and whether the trial court appropriately exercised its sentencing discretion. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134690 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nipulchandra Patel v. Robert J. Bukowski
. Bukowski asserts that: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss Patel’s punitive damages claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11742 - 2017-09-20
. Bukowski asserts that: (1) the trial court erred in refusing to dismiss Patel’s punitive damages claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11742 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared a witness unqualified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9283 - 2017-09-19
) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared a witness unqualified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9283 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Chandler D. Hall
was sufficient to support his conviction; and 2) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10841 - 2017-09-20
was sufficient to support his conviction; and 2) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10841 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. The plea agreement was presented by the State to the trial court as follows: THE COURT: [Assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28620 - 2007-04-03
. The plea agreement was presented by the State to the trial court as follows: THE COURT: [Assistant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28620 - 2007-04-03
State v. Ruven G. Seibert
. Seibert argues that the trial court erred by: (1) allowing the State’s expert witness to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4699 - 2005-03-31
. Seibert argues that the trial court erred by: (1) allowing the State’s expert witness to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4699 - 2005-03-31