Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17291 - 17300 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See id., 211 Wis. 2d at 203–204, 564 N.W.2d at 720. ¶10 The first Klessig step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76219 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
137 (1997). The referee's conclusions of law, however, are subject to de novo review. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20614 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John Nanna v. The Helen B. Daly Trust
was determined by summary judgment. It is sufficient to note that our review is de novo and summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26124 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2022AP408 5 DISCUSSION ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Estate of Paswaters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739074 - 2023-12-13

[PDF] Shannon S. v. Jackson C.
a question of statutory construction, an issue of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Williams, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7035 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo.” Portage Cnty. v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶10, 386 Wis. 2d 672, 927 N.W.2d 509
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440107 - 2021-10-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2012AP1336 4 DISCUSSION Standard of Review ¶8 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97393 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 681 N.W.2d 110. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Fond Du Lac
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252883 - 2020-01-28

[PDF] State v. John T. Werner
of law we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3297 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 7
are not contested. Our review of the circuit court’s legal conclusion upholding the search is de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74759 - 2014-09-15