Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17291 - 17300 of 20846 for word.
Search results 17291 - 17300 of 20846 for word.
Sylvia A. Shovers v. Gary D. Shovers
sufficient standing under the broadly worded Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act to get a declaration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24778 - 2006-06-27
sufficient standing under the broadly worded Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act to get a declaration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24778 - 2006-06-27
State v. Chaunte Ott
] cut her throat.” He stated that in reaction to Hadaway’s words, Ott said nothing except, “I got
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12141 - 2005-03-31
] cut her throat.” He stated that in reaction to Hadaway’s words, Ott said nothing except, “I got
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12141 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Chapter 72 - Retention of Court Records
is recognized as words, complete numbers or distinct symbols. (2) Court records specified in SCR 72.01
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087 - 2017-09-20
is recognized as words, complete numbers or distinct symbols. (2) Court records specified in SCR 72.01
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087 - 2017-09-20
WI App 64 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP265 Complete Title o...
cannot ignore words in a statute to achieve a desired construction. Rather, a statute should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112663 - 2015-06-03
cannot ignore words in a statute to achieve a desired construction. Rather, a statute should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112663 - 2015-06-03
[PDF]
State v. Zebelum Smith
. § 906.13(2)(a)2 limits that discretion. In other words, § 906.11 does not trump § 906.13, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4095 - 2017-09-20
. § 906.13(2)(a)2 limits that discretion. In other words, § 906.11 does not trump § 906.13, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4095 - 2017-09-20
State v. William Napper
and words she heard, counsels' deficient performance was not prejudicial; that is, it did not render
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
and words she heard, counsels' deficient performance was not prejudicial; that is, it did not render
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we focus on whether this error was harmless—in other words, whether it is clear beyond a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467402 - 2021-12-28
, we focus on whether this error was harmless—in other words, whether it is clear beyond a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467402 - 2021-12-28
[PDF]
Chapter 72 - Retention of Court Records
, numbers or symbols is recognized as words, complete numbers or distinct symbols. (2) Court records
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25800 - 2017-09-21
, numbers or symbols is recognized as words, complete numbers or distinct symbols. (2) Court records
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25800 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is the maximum penalty.” In other words, the trial court began the sentencing hearing by explicitly noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132030 - 2014-12-22
is the maximum penalty.” In other words, the trial court began the sentencing hearing by explicitly noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132030 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
identified a Facebook post in which M.C. stated that, in Dr. Lace’s words, it “would be okay with” M.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888389 - 2024-12-12
identified a Facebook post in which M.C. stated that, in Dr. Lace’s words, it “would be okay with” M.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888389 - 2024-12-12