Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1731 - 1740 of 12959 for prosecuting.
Search results 1731 - 1740 of 12959 for prosecuting.
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Steve Watters
incurred because he prosecuted an open records mandamus action. We affirm the judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11636 - 2005-03-31
incurred because he prosecuted an open records mandamus action. We affirm the judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11636 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clifton L. Watts
are whether the trial court erred by not excluding certain prosecution evidence because it had not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31
are whether the trial court erred by not excluding certain prosecution evidence because it had not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The prosecution agreed to recommend no more than ten years’ initial confinement and complied with that agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183995 - 2017-09-21
. The prosecution agreed to recommend no more than ten years’ initial confinement and complied with that agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Midthun
the jury to infer Midthun’s intent to deliver. The prosecution had a duty to prove all elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14857 - 2017-09-21
the jury to infer Midthun’s intent to deliver. The prosecution had a duty to prove all elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14857 - 2017-09-21
State v. Carlos Facundo
" the government into the criminal activity so as to make repugnant defendant's prosecution. State v. Gibas, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11557 - 2005-03-31
" the government into the criminal activity so as to make repugnant defendant's prosecution. State v. Gibas, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11557 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was imposed. WIS. STAT. § 973.155(1)(a). A person is “in custody” when subject to prosecution for escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29451 - 2014-09-15
was imposed. WIS. STAT. § 973.155(1)(a). A person is “in custody” when subject to prosecution for escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29451 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
the prosecution and for failing to investigate his case. After hearing testimony and argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5766 - 2017-09-19
the prosecution and for failing to investigate his case. After hearing testimony and argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5766 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Cauley
effective assistance of counsel and that the doctrine of double jeopardy precludes state prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8509 - 2017-09-19
effective assistance of counsel and that the doctrine of double jeopardy precludes state prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8509 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Linda R. Cauley
effective assistance of counsel and that the doctrine of double jeopardy precludes state prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8608 - 2017-09-19
effective assistance of counsel and that the doctrine of double jeopardy precludes state prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8608 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dariell D. Cross
discretion. Cross sought dismissal on the ground that double jeopardy precluded prosecution for battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14404 - 2014-09-15
discretion. Cross sought dismissal on the ground that double jeopardy precluded prosecution for battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14404 - 2014-09-15