Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1731 - 1740 of 3429 for y's.
Search results 1731 - 1740 of 3429 for y's.
COURT OF APPEALS
police, “[y]ou guys know” what happened. ¶33 Kissack also argues that, unlike the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44953 - 2009-12-22
police, “[y]ou guys know” what happened. ¶33 Kissack also argues that, unlike the defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44953 - 2009-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Renee told [Armstead] to come here and said [‘]what’s goin’ on.[’] At that point [Armstead] said[, ‘Y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36338 - 2009-05-04
. Renee told [Armstead] to come here and said [‘]what’s goin’ on.[’] At that point [Armstead] said[, ‘Y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36338 - 2009-05-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[y] on first or second degree intentional homicide. If the State does not satisfy you that those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260758 - 2020-05-19
[y] on first or second degree intentional homicide. If the State does not satisfy you that those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260758 - 2020-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
consuming any alcohol so you have an untruth. … [So], you had an odor.… [Y]ou had a second smell of an odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111914 - 2014-05-07
consuming any alcohol so you have an untruth. … [So], you had an odor.… [Y]ou had a second smell of an odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111914 - 2014-05-07
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
in the petition by stating: THE COURT: [Y]ou heard me describe to you that the grounds for these petitions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3425 - 2005-03-31
in the petition by stating: THE COURT: [Y]ou heard me describe to you that the grounds for these petitions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3425 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
in the petition by stating: THE COURT: [Y]ou heard me describe to you that the grounds for these petitions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3428 - 2005-03-31
in the petition by stating: THE COURT: [Y]ou heard me describe to you that the grounds for these petitions were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was quite jarring …. [M]y friends and I were worried about our safety and the safety of those around us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445932 - 2021-10-27
was quite jarring …. [M]y friends and I were worried about our safety and the safety of those around us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445932 - 2021-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” ¶4 The court then discussed B.M.’s rights in “the best interest phase of the proceedings”: [Y]ou
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728428 - 2023-11-14
.” ¶4 The court then discussed B.M.’s rights in “the best interest phase of the proceedings”: [Y]ou
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728428 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
Stainless Steel Fabricating, Inc. v. Roy Aitchison
,” was not satisfied because all the wholesaler had done was to “suppl[y] the court with a definition of trade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13959 - 2014-09-15
,” was not satisfied because all the wholesaler had done was to “suppl[y] the court with a definition of trade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13959 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that taking. So, they didn’t have no (DNA) so the[y] planted it there?” The missing buccal swab would have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143093 - 2015-06-10
that taking. So, they didn’t have no (DNA) so the[y] planted it there?” The missing buccal swab would have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143093 - 2015-06-10