Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17301 - 17310 of 68517 for did.
Search results 17301 - 17310 of 68517 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances, trial counsel’s decision not to file a suppression motion did not constitute ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
circumstances, trial counsel’s decision not to file a suppression motion did not constitute ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“unfitness,” and defaulted K.R.G. from contesting the court’s findings. K.R.G. did not attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165273 - 2017-09-21
“unfitness,” and defaulted K.R.G. from contesting the court’s findings. K.R.G. did not attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165273 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, did not enter an order regarding that extension. ¶4 On July 13, 2011, a status conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77519 - 2012-02-01
, did not enter an order regarding that extension. ¶4 On July 13, 2011, a status conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77519 - 2012-02-01
2008 WI APP 151
) Lubinski did not have standing to file his motion, and Jenny Lubinski did not have standing to file her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34120 - 2011-06-14
) Lubinski did not have standing to file his motion, and Jenny Lubinski did not have standing to file her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34120 - 2011-06-14
Keith Love v. John Eversman
as required by Wis. Stat. § 803.80(1)(a) & (b), and, as a result, the trial court did not have jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13772 - 2005-03-31
as required by Wis. Stat. § 803.80(1)(a) & (b), and, as a result, the trial court did not have jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13772 - 2005-03-31
Carla B. v. Timothy N.
of a notice of intent to appeal upon a number of persons, including her. Because she did not get served, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31
of a notice of intent to appeal upon a number of persons, including her. Because she did not get served, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the circuit court. We conclude that Gross’s trial counsel did not perform deficiently and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574871 - 2022-10-11
to the circuit court. We conclude that Gross’s trial counsel did not perform deficiently and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574871 - 2022-10-11
Dwayne G. Thomas v. David M. Schwarz
did not have jurisdiction to revoke his probation. See State ex rel. Cox v. DHSS, 105 Wis. 2d 378
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18649 - 2005-06-21
did not have jurisdiction to revoke his probation. See State ex rel. Cox v. DHSS, 105 Wis. 2d 378
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18649 - 2005-06-21
Ann Renee Culligan v. Nicolas Cindric
argues that the December 2001 child support modification order did not “substantially affect” placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5595 - 2005-03-31
argues that the December 2001 child support modification order did not “substantially affect” placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5595 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence seized during his arrest because the police did not have a warrant or probable cause for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575519 - 2022-10-11
evidence seized during his arrest because the police did not have a warrant or probable cause for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575519 - 2022-10-11