Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17311 - 17320 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17311 - 17320 of 29823 for des.
Frontsheet
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42388 - 2009-10-19
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42388 - 2009-10-19
Jeanne Finkenbinder v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12047 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12047 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
findings of fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. This court decides de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1047472 - 2025-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo the application of undisputed facts to constitutional principles. See County of Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415504 - 2021-08-25
review de novo the application of undisputed facts to constitutional principles. See County of Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=415504 - 2021-08-25
State v. Taurius S. Fluker
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Ibid. We review de novo, however, whether a lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Ibid. We review de novo, however, whether a lawyer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7463 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d 404. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11, 305 Wis. 2d 641, 740 N.W.2d 404. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Warren Viergutz v. Marvin Kraut
, we apply the same methodology as the trial court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21
, we apply the same methodology as the trial court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21
State v. James S. Riedel
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of constitutional law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
to require a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. If a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
Frontsheet
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104581 - 2013-11-19
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104581 - 2013-11-19