Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17311 - 17320 of 29823 for des.
Search results 17311 - 17320 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6208 - 2017-09-19
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6208 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. We review this question de novo. Id. ¶16 Bosman contends his counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32752 - 2014-09-15
. We review this question de novo. Id. ¶16 Bosman contends his counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32752 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229897 - 2018-12-06
the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229897 - 2018-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44486 - 2009-12-09
to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App 213, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44486 - 2009-12-09
Marvin Poirier v. Town of Howard
of an excessive tax. This procedure, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2105 - 2005-03-31
of an excessive tax. This procedure, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 74.37, “allows for a trial de novo as a means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2105 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lonny Mayer
is whether the evidence adduced is sufficient to permit the instruction, our review is de novo, State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6870 - 2005-03-31
is whether the evidence adduced is sufficient to permit the instruction, our review is de novo, State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6870 - 2005-03-31
Bernard Willkomm v. Romeo Soriano, M.D.
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3618 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3618 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Kittilstad
. Szulczewski, 216 Wis.2d 494, 498, 574 N.W.2d 660, 662 (1998). Our review of a question of law is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14055 - 2014-09-15
. Szulczewski, 216 Wis.2d 494, 498, 574 N.W.2d 660, 662 (1998). Our review of a question of law is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14055 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242451 - 2019-06-26
the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242451 - 2019-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶33. ¶13 We conclude that Johnson has not demonstrated a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶33. ¶13 We conclude that Johnson has not demonstrated a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106275 - 2014-01-06