Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17311 - 17320 of 29712 for des.
Search results 17311 - 17320 of 29712 for des.
Frontsheet
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104868 - 2013-11-25
are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104868 - 2013-11-25
Donald Murtaugh v. State
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31
summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31
Kirk Bintzler v. Warden Thomas Borgen
by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo, Erickson Oil Prods., Inc. v. State, 184 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18284 - 2005-05-25
by sovereign immunity is a question of law that we decide de novo, Erickson Oil Prods., Inc. v. State, 184 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18284 - 2005-05-25
COURT OF APPEALS
Whether a police officer had probable cause to request a PBT is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36315 - 2009-04-29
Whether a police officer had probable cause to request a PBT is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36315 - 2009-04-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 681 N.W.2d 110. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Fond Du Lac
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252883 - 2020-01-28
, 681 N.W.2d 110. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Fond Du Lac
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252883 - 2020-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
, presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Kenosha County DHS v. Jodie W., 2006 WI 93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30167 - 2007-09-04
, presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Kenosha County DHS v. Jodie W., 2006 WI 93
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30167 - 2007-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
[PDF]
WI APP 149
requires that we apply the pertinent statutes, and, in doing so, our analysis is de novo. See ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34086 - 2014-09-15
requires that we apply the pertinent statutes, and, in doing so, our analysis is de novo. See ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34086 - 2014-09-15
Rainbow Springs Golf Company, Inc. v. Town of Mukwonago
the circuit court’s action de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005 WI App 16, ¶¶2, 9, 278 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18336 - 2005-07-26
the circuit court’s action de novo. State ex rel. Lawton v. Town of Barton, 2005 WI App 16, ¶¶2, 9, 278 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18336 - 2005-07-26
Dean P. Laing v. Adams County Planning and Zoning Department
review de novo. Id. The canons of statutory construction apply to interpretations of ordinances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8659 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Id. The canons of statutory construction apply to interpretations of ordinances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8659 - 2005-03-31