Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17321 - 17330 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
Search results 17321 - 17330 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55664 - 2010-10-18
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55664 - 2010-10-18
State v. Carl F. Hickman
decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ANALYSIS Nature and Consequences of the Plea ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
decides de novo. See Pritsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ANALYSIS Nature and Consequences of the Plea ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2101 - 2005-03-31
State v. John C. Johnson
which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38. ¶8 The Fourth Amendment of the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2276 - 2005-03-31
which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38. ¶8 The Fourth Amendment of the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2276 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a proper standard of law is an issue reviewed de novo by this court. Id. Ultimately, it is the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103342 - 2013-10-23
a proper standard of law is an issue reviewed de novo by this court. Id. Ultimately, it is the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103342 - 2013-10-23
State v. Aaron J. Grender
we review de novo. State v. Gammons, 2001 WI App 36, ¶6, 241 Wis. 2d 296, 625 N.W.2d 623. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7524 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. State v. Gammons, 2001 WI App 36, ¶6, 241 Wis. 2d 296, 625 N.W.2d 623. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7524 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James E. Gray
de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis.2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310, 313 (Ct. App. 1991). The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis.2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310, 313 (Ct. App. 1991). The primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo the application of constitutional standards to those facts. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32258 - 2008-03-26
review de novo the application of constitutional standards to those facts. State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32258 - 2008-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Kleser, 2010 WI 88, ¶36, 328 Wis. 2d 42, 786 N.W.2d 144
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102169 - 2013-09-24
interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Kleser, 2010 WI 88, ¶36, 328 Wis. 2d 42, 786 N.W.2d 144
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102169 - 2013-09-24
The Estate of Mildred Furgason and the Estate of John Furgason v.
one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11503 - 2005-03-31
one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11503 - 2005-03-31
Roy F. Bartels v. Rural Mutual Insurance Company
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7161 - 2005-03-31
judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7161 - 2005-03-31