Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17321 - 17330 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 17321 - 17330 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
CA Blank Order
for the State dismissing two charges against him and recommending no more than seventeen years of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112693 - 2014-05-15
for the State dismissing two charges against him and recommending no more than seventeen years of initial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112693 - 2014-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was dismissed as a read-in at sentencing. Sentencing immediately followed the acceptance of the plea. Both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103800 - 2017-09-21
was dismissed as a read-in at sentencing. Sentencing immediately followed the acceptance of the plea. Both
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kimberly A. Tomaras
to dismiss the refusal proceeding. ¶3 Tomaras’s motion did not allege that the officer lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5218 - 2017-09-19
to dismiss the refusal proceeding. ¶3 Tomaras’s motion did not allege that the officer lacked probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5218 - 2017-09-19
State v. Larry Anderson
of cocaine as a subsequent offender in exchange for a dismissal and read-in of the second count, and a limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3843 - 2005-03-31
of cocaine as a subsequent offender in exchange for a dismissal and read-in of the second count, and a limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3843 - 2005-03-31
State v. Amado Saldana, Jr.
also appeals an order denying his motion to modify the sentence based on new factors. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14216 - 2005-03-31
also appeals an order denying his motion to modify the sentence based on new factors. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14216 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denied Nealy’s motion, and Nealy appeals. We conclude that Nealy’s arguments are without merit, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32893 - 2008-06-02
denied Nealy’s motion, and Nealy appeals. We conclude that Nealy’s arguments are without merit, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32893 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court denied a suppression motion, which motion contended that the officer improperly entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132589 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court denied a suppression motion, which motion contended that the officer improperly entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to have the DNA surcharge vacated because the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118470 - 2014-09-15
the order denying his postconviction motion seeking to have the DNA surcharge vacated because the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118470 - 2014-09-15
State v. David W. Oakley
at sentencing to withdraw the plea agreement. The court granted the motion to withdraw.[2] Thereafter, Oakley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
at sentencing to withdraw the plea agreement. The court granted the motion to withdraw.[2] Thereafter, Oakley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enhancer was struck and four other counts were dismissed as read-ins. As a result, his maximum sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193094 - 2017-09-21
enhancer was struck and four other counts were dismissed as read-ins. As a result, his maximum sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193094 - 2017-09-21