Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17331 - 17340 of 29942 for des.
Search results 17331 - 17340 of 29942 for des.
State v. Johnny Bohannon
with the Fourth Amendment is de novo, see State v. Angiolo, 186 Wis.2d 488, 494–495, 520 N.W.2d 923, 927 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9051 - 2005-03-31
with the Fourth Amendment is de novo, see State v. Angiolo, 186 Wis.2d 488, 494–495, 520 N.W.2d 923, 927 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9051 - 2005-03-31
West Bend Mutual Ins. Co. v. Stacy L. Stegner
statutes implicated by the policy language. Both interpretations are questions of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15756 - 2005-03-31
statutes implicated by the policy language. Both interpretations are questions of law which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15756 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kendell G.
of statutory interpretation, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3332 - 2017-09-19
of statutory interpretation, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Michels, 141 Wis. 2d 81, 87, 414
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3332 - 2017-09-19
Pamela J. Kranski v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
of an insurance contract presents this court with a question of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16095 - 2005-03-31
of an insurance contract presents this court with a question of law, which we review de novo. Smith v. Katz, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16095 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bobbie K.
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
at 107. We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18646 - 2005-06-20
State v. Abby J. Olson
. ¶7 The issue is one of statutory interpretation—a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16173 - 2005-03-31
. ¶7 The issue is one of statutory interpretation—a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16173 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher E. Betow
statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14443 - 2005-03-31
statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14443 - 2005-03-31
Ohio State Department of Taxation v. Ronald E. Skelton
independently on appeal.” Thus, we review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14445 - 2005-03-31
independently on appeal.” Thus, we review the trial court’s decision de novo. ¶6 Skelton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14445 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
¶15 We review a denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115737 - 2014-06-30
¶15 We review a denial of summary judgment de novo, applying the same well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115737 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous, but decide de novo the legal question of whether counsel was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142860 - 2017-09-21
clearly erroneous, but decide de novo the legal question of whether counsel was constitutionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142860 - 2017-09-21