Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17331 - 17340 of 68502 for did.
Search results 17331 - 17340 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction on double jeopardy grounds and that Richardson’s counsel did not provide ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21
conviction on double jeopardy grounds and that Richardson’s counsel did not provide ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI APP 145
We conclude Securitas was not negligent, as a matter of law, because the circumstances did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27
We conclude Securitas was not negligent, as a matter of law, because the circumstances did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40218 - 2009-10-27
State v. Nicholas A.G.
the court’s findings and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12589 - 2005-03-31
the court’s findings and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12589 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregg A. Pfaff
test of his blood. Initially, Pfaff did not respond. He did not make eye contact with the deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5407 - 2005-03-31
test of his blood. Initially, Pfaff did not respond. He did not make eye contact with the deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5407 - 2005-03-31
State v. Linda D.
ineffective assistance. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13896 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13896 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
decision.[4] Biever, 2005AP3176, unpublished order at 4. The circuit court did not, as Kasee contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29404 - 2007-06-19
decision.[4] Biever, 2005AP3176, unpublished order at 4. The circuit court did not, as Kasee contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29404 - 2007-06-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
he did nothing to provoke the victim and others to attack. Because the statements were voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31123 - 2014-09-15
he did nothing to provoke the victim and others to attack. Because the statements were voluntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31123 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contended, the amounts were not reasonable and his circumstances did not permit him to make the payments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170612 - 2017-09-21
contended, the amounts were not reasonable and his circumstances did not permit him to make the payments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. It concluded that Filippo did not perform deficiently at the grounds trial and, even if he did, his alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253977 - 2020-02-12
. It concluded that Filippo did not perform deficiently at the grounds trial and, even if he did, his alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253977 - 2020-02-12
State v. Robert K.
silent. He raised no objection to moving past that date and did not advise the court that later dates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7670 - 2005-03-31
silent. He raised no objection to moving past that date and did not advise the court that later dates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7670 - 2005-03-31