Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17331 - 17340 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 17331 - 17340 of 24568 for extending.
State v. Samuel Jones
extended to the pretrial context. Id. at ¶32, 232 Wis. 2d at 696, 605 N.W.2d at 853 (relying on United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2005-03-31
extended to the pretrial context. Id. at ¶32, 232 Wis. 2d at 696, 605 N.W.2d at 853 (relying on United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2896 - 2005-03-31
Finance Service Corporation v. Harold E. Drees
Lumber Liquidators an extension of time to answer, and the answer was timely under that extended deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19833 - 2005-10-03
Lumber Liquidators an extension of time to answer, and the answer was timely under that extended deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19833 - 2005-10-03
State v. David L. Shaw
for a mistrial. Our discretionary power of reversal pursuant to § 752.35, Stats., extends to situations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10507 - 2005-03-31
for a mistrial. Our discretionary power of reversal pursuant to § 752.35, Stats., extends to situations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10507 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143982 - 2017-09-21
of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143982 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald J. Buford
by twenty years’ extended supervision. ¶6 Buford filed a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
by twenty years’ extended supervision. ¶6 Buford filed a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6924 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision on the armed robbery charge. It sentenced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468095 - 2021-12-30
of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision on the armed robbery charge. It sentenced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468095 - 2021-12-30
COURT OF APPEALS
sentenced him to twenty-seven months’ initial confinement and thirty-three months’ extended supervision out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67815 - 2011-07-18
sentenced him to twenty-seven months’ initial confinement and thirty-three months’ extended supervision out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67815 - 2011-07-18
State v. Richard J. Anthuber
on to extend his mandatory release date from Racine Correctional. See § 302.11(2), Stats. He specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9068 - 2005-03-31
on to extend his mandatory release date from Racine Correctional. See § 302.11(2), Stats. He specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9068 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sentenced him to life imprisonment without eligibility for extended supervision. The circuit court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107616 - 2014-02-03
sentenced him to life imprisonment without eligibility for extended supervision. The circuit court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107616 - 2014-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
not be extended “beyond the 18th birthday unless” the order was under the Serious Juvenile Offender Program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27273 - 2006-11-27
not be extended “beyond the 18th birthday unless” the order was under the Serious Juvenile Offender Program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27273 - 2006-11-27