Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17341 - 17350 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 17341 - 17350 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Mark R. Anderson
did not violate the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.[2] ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20383 - 2005-11-22
did not violate the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.[2] ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20383 - 2005-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Pamela said she recently had seen him in the house with a gun. A search of the home revealed the drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101482 - 2013-09-03
. Pamela said she recently had seen him in the house with a gun. A search of the home revealed the drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101482 - 2013-09-03
Halquist Stone Company, Inc. v. Town of Brothertown Planning and Zoning Committee
. The reviewing court is not required to supply its own factual conclusions through a de novo search of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12029 - 2005-03-31
. The reviewing court is not required to supply its own factual conclusions through a de novo search of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12029 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. See 4 LaFave, Search and Seizure § 9.5(e), at 687-91 (5th ed. 2012) (discussing reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97503 - 2013-05-29
. See 4 LaFave, Search and Seizure § 9.5(e), at 687-91 (5th ed. 2012) (discussing reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97503 - 2013-05-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
. A search of the car revealed a second revolver. ¶3 Lord filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27585 - 2014-09-15
. A search of the car revealed a second revolver. ¶3 Lord filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27585 - 2014-09-15
Hubert Hill v. Paul Zimmerman
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7964 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7964 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 4
2019 WI App 4 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2018AP75-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229074 - 2019-02-08
2019 WI App 4 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2018AP75-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229074 - 2019-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592322 - 2022-11-23
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592322 - 2022-11-23
Dale G. Eisner v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
that in exchange for a release from the case, American Family would assign its interest in the advanced payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16311 - 2005-03-31
that in exchange for a release from the case, American Family would assign its interest in the advanced payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Halquist Stone Company, Inc. v. Town of Brothertown Planning and Zoning Committee
use permit. This determination was not appealed. 2 The cases actually equate “substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12029 - 2017-09-21
use permit. This determination was not appealed. 2 The cases actually equate “substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12029 - 2017-09-21