Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17341 - 17350 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 17341 - 17350 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Chandler D. Hall
was sufficient to support his conviction; and 2) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10841 - 2017-09-20
was sufficient to support his conviction; and 2) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10841 - 2017-09-20
State v. Patricia G.
finding her in default, the trial court erred in excusing her attorney and subsequently holding the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
finding her in default, the trial court erred in excusing her attorney and subsequently holding the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6515 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ryan E. Brockman
. The issues are whether: (1) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9287 - 2005-03-31
. The issues are whether: (1) the State can appeal the order; (2) the trial court erred when it declared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9287 - 2005-03-31
Donald R. Stringer v. Joyce D. Stringer
erroneously exercised its discretion. We conclude that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9263 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion. We conclude that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9263 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald R. Stringer v. Joyce D. Stringer
. We conclude that: No. 95-1751 -2- (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9263 - 2017-09-19
. We conclude that: No. 95-1751 -2- (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9263 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jeffrey Knight v. Milwaukee County
. No. 00-0929 2 ¶1 FINE, J. Jeffrey and Norris Knight appeal from orders entered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2463 - 2017-09-19
. No. 00-0929 2 ¶1 FINE, J. Jeffrey and Norris Knight appeal from orders entered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2463 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frederick F.
, following a court trial, for second-degree recklessly endangering safety, substantial battery while armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15250 - 2005-03-31
, following a court trial, for second-degree recklessly endangering safety, substantial battery while armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15250 - 2005-03-31
Dawn M. Malinowski v. Brian G. Malinowski
dismissed the order to show cause. Dawn sought a de novo review before the trial court. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11226 - 2013-07-02
dismissed the order to show cause. Dawn sought a de novo review before the trial court. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11226 - 2013-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
by the Medical College of Wisconsin (Medical College). She submits that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35494 - 2009-02-09
by the Medical College of Wisconsin (Medical College). She submits that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35494 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
Digicorp, Inc. v. Ameritech Corporation
. ¶4 Bacher argues that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4327 - 2017-09-19
. ¶4 Bacher argues that: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4327 - 2017-09-19