Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17341 - 17350 of 39491 for wife of dane grospe.

AT&T Communications of Wisconsin v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
., Interested Parties-Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18779 - 2005-06-29

Norman C. Danielson v. City of Sun Prairie
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16121 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sarah R.P.
. § 990.010(1); see also Swatek v. County of Dane, 192 Wis. 2d 47, 61, 531 N.W.2d 45 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2890 - 2005-03-31

2008 WI APP 122
v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58, ¶45, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33436 - 2008-08-26

State v. Charles B. Knudtson
of the circuit court for Dane County: gerald c. nichol, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17890 - 2005-05-02

[PDF] 121 Langdon Street Group v. Scott Heiligman
SILVERMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7526 - 2017-09-19

State v. Bryan P. Weiler
of the circuit court for Dane County: robert de chambeau, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 DYKMAN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26014 - 2006-07-26

[PDF] Rsidue, LLC v. Michael R. Michaud
in the statutory language it chose to enact. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25885 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
could reach.” Dane Cnty. DHS v. Mable K., 2013 WI 28, ¶39, 346 Wis. 2d 396, 828 N.W.2d 198. ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701838 - 2023-09-12

WI App 73 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2167 Complete Title ...
of a municipal ordinance, which is a question of law we ordinarily review de novo. Board of Regents v. Dane Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63155 - 2012-01-22