Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17351 - 17360 of 52614 for address.
Search results 17351 - 17360 of 52614 for address.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the motion for sentence modification raised the same issue that was addressed in the order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
the motion for sentence modification raised the same issue that was addressed in the order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Amy T-A. v. Judy A.
. ¶7 This court first addresses Judy A.’s challenge to the trial court’s jurisdiction. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3084 - 2017-09-20
. ¶7 This court first addresses Judy A.’s challenge to the trial court’s jurisdiction. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3084 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William James, Jr.
not address the second. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697. James contends that because Goldstein advised him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8472 - 2017-09-19
not address the second. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697. James contends that because Goldstein advised him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8472 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
not address Giuffre’s additional claims of error. See Gross v. Hoffman, 227 Wis. 296, 300, 277 N.W. 663, 665
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11101 - 2017-09-19
not address Giuffre’s additional claims of error. See Gross v. Hoffman, 227 Wis. 296, 300, 277 N.W. 663, 665
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11101 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing. The no-merit report addresses whether LaPointe knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654652 - 2023-05-09
hearing. The no-merit report addresses whether LaPointe knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654652 - 2023-05-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
stated it was not addressing whether there was probable cause to arrest for operating under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15
stated it was not addressing whether there was probable cause to arrest for operating under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and that such performance prejudiced his defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). We need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45773 - 2010-01-13
and that such performance prejudiced his defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). We need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45773 - 2010-01-13
CA Blank Order
counsel to file a supplemental no-merit report addressing the plea-taking procedure in this case.[2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
counsel to file a supplemental no-merit report addressing the plea-taking procedure in this case.[2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107627 - 2014-02-04
State v. Mark Alan Szarkowitz
challenged the validity of a repeater enhancement to his sentence. He did not address this issue in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6163 - 2005-03-31
challenged the validity of a repeater enhancement to his sentence. He did not address this issue in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6163 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the supreme court specifically stated it was not addressing whether there was probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35791 - 2009-03-10
that the supreme court specifically stated it was not addressing whether there was probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35791 - 2009-03-10