Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17351 - 17360 of 30115 for de.

General Casualty Insurance Company v. Feuling Concrete Construction, Inc.
of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Just v. Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7860 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Annette S.
standards governing termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6495 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
asks us to disregard the court’s assessment of the best interests factors and substitute our own de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247831 - 2020-01-30

[PDF] Raul J. Walters v. National Properties, LLC
is a question of law which we review de novo. Erickson v. Gundersen, 183 Wis. 2d 106, 115, 515 N.W.2d 293
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6334 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Slough Creek Properties v. Columbia County
application to an undisputed set of facts presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8839 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6218 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6217 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Robert C. Knight
was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 973, 468
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15116 - 2017-09-21

State v. Warren A. Goodman
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo. Kimbrough, 246 Wis. 2d 648, ¶27. ¶12 The “[f]ailure to call a potential witness may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170189 - 2017-09-21