Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17371 - 17380 of 29713 for des.
Search results 17371 - 17380 of 29713 for des.
State v. April O.
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16019 - 2005-03-31
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., De Pere. COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16019 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and misapplied the law. We disagree. ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73242 - 2011-11-08
and misapplied the law. We disagree. ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73242 - 2011-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
and the Shiffra-Green materiality test presents a question of law that we review de novo. Robertson, 2003 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119412 - 2014-08-13
and the Shiffra-Green materiality test presents a question of law that we review de novo. Robertson, 2003 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119412 - 2014-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 8, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co. v. Vorbeck, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37243 - 2009-07-07
present a question of law that we review de novo. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co. v. Vorbeck, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37243 - 2009-07-07
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
a question of law subject to our de novo review. Id. ¶10 In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5653 - 2005-03-31
a question of law subject to our de novo review. Id. ¶10 In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5653 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that are sufficient to require a hearing presents an additional question of law for our de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103706 - 2013-11-04
that are sufficient to require a hearing presents an additional question of law for our de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103706 - 2013-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130390 - 2014-11-30
fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id. Second, we review de novo the application of those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130390 - 2014-11-30
American World, Inc. v. City of Wisconsin Dells
. State ex rel. Ruffalo v. Common Council, 38 Wis.2d 518, 525, 157 N.W.2d 568, 571 (1968). We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10296 - 2005-03-31
. State ex rel. Ruffalo v. Common Council, 38 Wis.2d 518, 525, 157 N.W.2d 568, 571 (1968). We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10296 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Lynch v. Carriage Ridge, LLC
the argument. First, we are reviewing the construction of the agreement de novo and we need not concern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4984 - 2005-03-31
the argument. First, we are reviewing the construction of the agreement de novo and we need not concern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4984 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing. ¶8 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100241 - 2013-07-31
hearing. ¶8 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100241 - 2013-07-31