Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17371 - 17380 of 68502 for did.
Search results 17371 - 17380 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was not named in the search warrant.4 Yang further asserted that he did not live in the home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278071 - 2020-08-18
was not named in the search warrant.4 Yang further asserted that he did not live in the home
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278071 - 2020-08-18
[PDF]
State v. Anthony M. Cotton
2 bound over for trial. However, the State did not repeat this charge in the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5836 - 2017-09-19
2 bound over for trial. However, the State did not repeat this charge in the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5836 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 96
, the 1 One of the officers testified at the hearing on Lee’s suppression motion that he did not see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36685 - 2014-09-15
, the 1 One of the officers testified at the hearing on Lee’s suppression motion that he did not see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36685 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was face down in the parking lot.” 2 Storm did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594757 - 2022-11-29
was face down in the parking lot.” 2 Storm did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594757 - 2022-11-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances, trial counsel’s decision not to file a suppression motion did not constitute ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
circumstances, trial counsel’s decision not to file a suppression motion did not constitute ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“unfitness,” and defaulted K.R.G. from contesting the court’s findings. K.R.G. did not attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165273 - 2017-09-21
“unfitness,” and defaulted K.R.G. from contesting the court’s findings. K.R.G. did not attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165273 - 2017-09-21
Carla B. v. Timothy N.
of a notice of intent to appeal upon a number of persons, including her. Because she did not get served, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31
of a notice of intent to appeal upon a number of persons, including her. Because she did not get served, she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nicholas A.G.
the court’s findings and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12589 - 2005-03-31
the court’s findings and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12589 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Simmons
argues that, initially, the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7353 - 2005-03-31
argues that, initially, the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7353 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, did not enter an order regarding that extension. ¶4 On July 13, 2011, a status conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77519 - 2012-02-01
, did not enter an order regarding that extension. ¶4 On July 13, 2011, a status conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77519 - 2012-02-01