Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17381 - 17390 of 29832 for des.
Search results 17381 - 17390 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 7, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See id. I. Trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57399 - 2010-12-06
to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See id. I. Trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57399 - 2010-12-06
State v. Mitchel L. Schanke
, 218 Wis.2d 180, 189-90, 577 N.W.2d 794, 798-99 (1998), our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13749 - 2005-03-31
, 218 Wis.2d 180, 189-90, 577 N.W.2d 794, 798-99 (1998), our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13749 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth Fowler
we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2950 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2950 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶31. ¶8 Here, Williams argues that the plea colloquy was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶31. ¶8 Here, Williams argues that the plea colloquy was defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶27. Second, the court applies the law to those facts de novo. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934383 - 2025-04-01
the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶27. Second, the court applies the law to those facts de novo. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934383 - 2025-04-01
Georgene A. Williams v. City of New Holstein
that we decide de novo. Oaks v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 195 Wis. 2d 42, 47, 535 N.W.2d 120 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2616 - 2005-03-31
that we decide de novo. Oaks v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 195 Wis. 2d 42, 47, 535 N.W.2d 120 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2616 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karl D. Heppner
the weight to be accorded his [or her] testimony is for the [fact-finder].” Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13239 - 2017-09-21
the weight to be accorded his [or her] testimony is for the [fact-finder].” Riehl v. De Quaine, 24 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13239 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206653 - 2018-01-10
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206653 - 2018-01-10
[PDF]
State v.
was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo.” Id. (internal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15514 - 2017-09-21
was deficient and, if so, whether it was prejudicial are legal issues we review de novo.” Id. (internal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Eldon Boddie v. David H. Schwarz
, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11271 - 2017-09-19
, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11271 - 2017-09-19