Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17381 - 17390 of 29828 for des.
Search results 17381 - 17390 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4059 - 2017-09-20
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4059 - 2017-09-20
Donald L. Demmer v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
, 476 (1980). We do note, however, that our review is de novo. Kotecki & Radtke, S.C. v. Johnson, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8634 - 2005-03-31
, 476 (1980). We do note, however, that our review is de novo. Kotecki & Radtke, S.C. v. Johnson, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8634 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven A. Conway
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8680 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis.2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74, 77 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8680 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation and the application of a statute to a given set of facts are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407378 - 2021-08-10
interpretation and the application of a statute to a given set of facts are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407378 - 2021-08-10
[PDF]
Joshua D. Hansen v. Carl H. Degnitz
the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17882 - 2017-09-21
the terms of each policy. This task presents a question of law for our de novo review. Lechner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17882 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08(2). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66695 - 2014-09-15
. § 802.08(2). We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66695 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Outagamie County v. Karen C.
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Karen C. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Karen C. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4556 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Committee
, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16146 - 2017-09-21
, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. See UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16146 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 92 (citation omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108889 - 2014-03-11
N.W.2d 92 (citation omitted). We review de novo whether a party has met its burden of establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108889 - 2014-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Id. ¶7 Robinson’s postconviction motion was denied without a hearing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133770 - 2015-01-28
we review de novo. Id. ¶7 Robinson’s postconviction motion was denied without a hearing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133770 - 2015-01-28