Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17381 - 17390 of 69155 for he.
Search results 17381 - 17390 of 69155 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard. The Oppors’ argument is based on the trial court’s statement that he believed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39993 - 2009-08-25
legal standard. The Oppors’ argument is based on the trial court’s statement that he believed the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39993 - 2009-08-25
[PDF]
Margaret Henkel v. William West, M.D.
wife, Margaret Henkel, and requiring him to contribute to her attorney fees. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15271 - 2017-09-21
wife, Margaret Henkel, and requiring him to contribute to her attorney fees. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15271 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Deborah E.
termination of his parental rights. He argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4679 - 2017-09-19
termination of his parental rights. He argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4679 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 145
that he is appealing the trial-court order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28883 - 2014-09-15
that he is appealing the trial-court order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eugene M. Perkins
three strokes. Perkins had no cognitive or mental limitations. While he was allegedly wheelchair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7122 - 2017-09-20
three strokes. Perkins had no cognitive or mental limitations. While he was allegedly wheelchair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7122 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and convincing evidence that he was in need of protective placement. As explained below, there was sufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551878 - 2022-08-04
and convincing evidence that he was in need of protective placement. As explained below, there was sufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=551878 - 2022-08-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the “Waukesha County Juvenile Court Office.” The letter also informed M.J.S. that he was “required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216688 - 2018-08-01
the “Waukesha County Juvenile Court Office.” The letter also informed M.J.S. that he was “required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216688 - 2018-08-01
[PDF]
State v. Deborah E.
termination of his parental rights. He argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4681 - 2017-09-19
termination of his parental rights. He argues that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4681 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to the crime and repeat offender.[2] He was sentenced to forty years in prison for the armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46104 - 2010-01-26
to the crime and repeat offender.[2] He was sentenced to forty years in prison for the armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46104 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to WIS. STAT. § 944.20(1)(b) based on an incident in which he allegedly exposed his penis to a woman I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663977 - 2023-06-02
to WIS. STAT. § 944.20(1)(b) based on an incident in which he allegedly exposed his penis to a woman I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663977 - 2023-06-02