Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17391 - 17400 of 58951 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 17391 - 17400 of 58951 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
in a written decision and this appeal follows. II. Analysis. Cole claims there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
in a written decision and this appeal follows. II. Analysis. Cole claims there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
State v. Travis E. Blanks
claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because § 971.05(3), Stats., was not complied with. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because § 971.05(3), Stats., was not complied with. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the deposit account were exempt from the claims of creditors. We disagree and affirm the amended order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32974 - 2008-06-09
in the deposit account were exempt from the claims of creditors. We disagree and affirm the amended order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32974 - 2008-06-09
State v. Michael R. Remmel
plea, claiming it was not knowingly entered because the circuit court failed to inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19253 - 2005-08-08
plea, claiming it was not knowingly entered because the circuit court failed to inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19253 - 2005-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
27, 2005 through April 30, 2006. ¶5 WPS paid benefits for all claims through October 24, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34073 - 2008-09-23
27, 2005 through April 30, 2006. ¶5 WPS paid benefits for all claims through October 24, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34073 - 2008-09-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to sentencing. He claimed that he “was not fully aware of the factual allegations in the complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
to sentencing. He claimed that he “was not fully aware of the factual allegations in the complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645817 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment; Godec sought judgment as a matter of law on the claims, while the defendants sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214995 - 2018-07-03
for summary judgment; Godec sought judgment as a matter of law on the claims, while the defendants sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214995 - 2018-07-03
COURT OF APPEALS
that issue by not first filing a postconviction motion. Gentry then filed a postconviction motion claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48600 - 2010-03-31
that issue by not first filing a postconviction motion. Gentry then filed a postconviction motion claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48600 - 2010-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the ground that it was procedurally barred under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251796 - 2019-12-26
ineffective assistance of counsel claim on the ground that it was procedurally barred under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251796 - 2019-12-26
State v. William Avery
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion.[1] Avery claims that: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31