Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 17391 - 17400 of 35208 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Rencana Anggaran Biaya Rumah Type 60/84 Murah Tempel Sleman.

07AP1728 Alan Dordel v. Arlyn W. Nofke
App 60, ¶34, 252 Wis. 2d 426, 643 N.W.2d 98, he faults the court for not considering whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32948 - 2008-06-10

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
9 In 1994 the supreme court increased the hourly compensation under SCR 81.02 from $60 to $70
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67390 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Avery, 2013 WI 13, ¶22, 345 Wis. 2d 407, 826 N.W.2d 60. To be entitled to a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967734 - 2025-06-10

State v. Rhody R. Mallick
scope of federal constitutional guarantees .…” State v. Sorenson, 143 Wis.2d 226, 259-60, 421 N.W.2d 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11606 - 2005-03-31

Supreme Court of Wisconsin No. 10-03 In the matter of the petition to amend Supre...
the hourly compensation under SCR 81.02 from $60 to $70 after hearing argument and evidence that the $60 rate
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67390 - 2011-07-05

COURT OF APPEALS
on October 17, 2005, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(a) and (2) (2005–06)[2] and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34675 - 2008-11-24

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
9 In 1994 the supreme court increased the hourly compensation under SCR 81.02 from $60 to $70
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67390 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
in Wisconsin. ¶26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of the date of this order, Nikola P. Kostich shall
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58034 - 2010-12-20

Patricia Lemke-Wojnicki v. Paul & Cindy Kolodziaj
Wis. 2d 250, 259-60, 580 N.W.2d 233 (1998). The question of the defendant’s duty of care is analyzed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5201 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jolie M. Semancik
the date of this order. ¶29 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of the date of this order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19955 - 2005-10-13